
The Struggle for Siliconia - Part 1 of 3
Despite the fact that it has the largest concentration of activity
and has generated more jobs than any other high tech region in
the US, a combination of factors--dispersed geography and lingering
perceptions of frivolity to add to the earlier talk of the "death"
of aerospace and the dominating presence of the entertainment
industry--perpetuates Southern California's unique struggle with
being taken seriously as a leading "siliconia."
During
last week's launch event for Heart
of Gold, larta's report on the Southern California
life sciences industry, the subject of the panel discussion, and
a central theme throughout the report, was the lingering problem
of the region's inability to brand itself as a leading bioscience
center, despite
the fact that it has a larger employment force and more companies
then San Diego and the Bay Area, which are recognized as the nation's
bioscience hotspots. The branding dilemma issues identified throughout
Heart of Gold echo the continuing paradox affecting the other
sectors of Southern California's technology industry. The industry's
resources and possibilities are present, yet the complex and often
cyclical problems cause an ongoing stagnation--, urban sprawl
which does not foster easy industry "clustering, the often
negative generalizations of California in general and Los Angeles
in particular, the lack of media recognition, the area's reputation
as a Hollywood-only destination, the chasm between professionals
and resources, the low rate of technology transfer. All of these
issues have caused the Southern California technology industry
to suffer the effects of an identity crisis, a siliconia that
is robust yet largely unseen.
The Right Start
Southern California's technology history was the product of as
sudden a boom as its other early twentieth century counterpart,
the motion picture industry. *With the mass deployment of utility
infrastructures and freeway construction in the early part of
the century, the region had established an ample engineering and
scientific community. Meanwhile Pasadena-based Caltech, founded
in the late 19th century, had also become the nation's most prominent
science university by the 30s. After the demand for hard science
flourished in the second World War, Southern California saw its
most significant ascent in hi-tech activity with the aerospace
boom which, between 1947 and 1957, had accounted for almost half
of Southern California's economic growth. The area's large pool
of scientific and technical talent also spawned "spill-over"
sciences, such as computing, medical devices, communications and
biotechnology.
Despite
the fact that there was significant activity in these areas, Southern
California's technology image centered largely upon aerospace
and defense. Thus, when the downsizing came in the early 1990s,
most economists, the media and government predicted general economic
decline which would have catastrophic effects on the entire region.
This kind of narrowed perception has lead to what many in the
industry feel is the ongoing difficulty to brand Southern California
as a tech sector. While the region witnessed a steady growth in
technology in the 1990s, it remained largely unnoticed. Most of
the attention--from media, investment and industry--fell upon
the Bay Area, already recognized and branded as Silicon Valley.
This high-profile branding crowned the northern region as both
the state's and the nation's "high-tech central", distinguished
from that tumultuous aerospace environment better known as Southern
California.
Image
and Identity
"The
outside perception is still that LA is not a technology center
and it continually runs against these obstacles," said Ross
DeVol, a prominent economist with the Santa Monica-based Milken
Institute. "When we did the America's High Tech Economy
report, many people directly and not so directly mentioned that
they felt the only reason we included some of the digital entertainment
in the high tech definition is because we wanted to boost LA's
standing. This is a major branding issue for the region. It's
one thing to think you're important yourself but to have other
people recognize your importance is a different matter."
Aside
from living in the Silicon Valley shadow, Southern California's
tech industry also has had to struggle with the large amount of
negative associations about both California and particularly Los
Angeles. The lack of understanding about the geographical reaches
of the area led to generalized descriptions which lumped together
significantly overachieving areas like Pasadena, Ventura County
and Orange County into the negative mix. As DeVol noted, to most
people, Los Angeles is, "earthquakes, floods riots,"
as well as a flurry of other complex and often contradictory perceptions--smog-ridden,
a wasteland of crime and gangs, racially hostile, while also overly-decadent,
relaxed and frivolous. These perceptions took a particularly harsh
turn in the early 1990s during the wave of highly sensationalized
violence and disasters, such as the Rodney King beatings and the
subsequent riots, the flooding, earthquakes and even the OJ Simpson
trial. Mainstream media frequently depicted the region as a corrupt,
urban hell whose glamorous veneer was merely a mask for the third
world city that lived beneath it. This perceived death of the
California dream was evident even in the most frivolous tides
of pop culture. When the long awaited 1982 sci-fi cult-favorite
Escape From New York was followed up with a sequel in 1995,
the film's producer decided to relocate the end-of-the-world tale
to Los Angeles because LA was a more "believable" setting
for apocalypse.
"Remember the headlines?," noted author and economist
Joel Kotkin, in a recent
article in the Los Angeles Times, The Bashers Are Back. "'California:
End of the Dream,' 'California Dream Turns Into a Nightmare,'
'State of Collapse.' The doomsayers were not just trend-jumping
journalists but also Wall Street analysts such as Prudential Bache's
George Salem, who wrote in 1992 that California, 'appears in the
early stages of a long-term economic slide.' It would take at
least a decade to recover, he proclaimed, if ever."
Despite
the continually arguable aspects of what California and Los Angeles
offers in terms of quality of life, the state and the region managed
to disprove much of the gloomy economic forecasts throughout the
90s, even under the weight of the aerospace cutbacks. *In Los
Angeles county, unemployment rates dropped steadily, from below
10 percent in 1995 to 7 percent by 1997. The technology sector
also witnessed steady growth, particularly in the biosciences
which saw a significant employment boom, where between 1994 and
1996 employment in public bio companies more than doubled.
click
here for Part 2 of 3: The Sum of Its Parts- The Geographical Struggle
by
Wendy Hall
larta staff writer
Rohit Shukla,
larta CEO also contributed to this report
Coming
this fall from larta:
Southern California Technology Innovation Index 2002
larta
will premiere its latest regional research report this fall, the
Southern California Technology Innovation Index 2002, an
update to the 2001
report which compared the growth and activity of the region's
technology industry compared to other areas. An economic benchmark
for the Southern California region, with hard data derived from
various statistical indicators, such as numbers of companies and
employees, educational resources, and investments, the new index
will include both updated numbers and new sections on Santa Barbara
and New York, as well as in-depth policy analysis.
Click
here for more information on Southern California Technology
Innovation Index 2001
*research
from Southern
California in the Information Age, by Joel Kotkin. Joel
Kotkin's writings and information on his best-selling book New
Geography, can be found at his web page, www.newgeography.com.
For research and reports by Milken
Institute economist Ross DeVol, visit the Institute's publications
page.
For more information on the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation's
studies, click here.